Draft · v1.0

Briefing · Commentary

The Postcode Playbook

“Every postcode” is already the government’s organising phrase. This briefing focuses on public procurement and the impact economy to explain why the government now needs a Postcode Playbook, and provides a first draft for what it should cover. SDWH already builds data explorers to postcode granularity and works with clients who need to do the same.

The summer 2026 convergence

  • “Every postcode” now appears across three government instruments.
  • No.10 North specifically focuses on making policy reach every postcode.
  • Social value in central government contracts is defined around “every postcode,” and scored against deprivation from January 2027.
  • The Office for the Impact Economy puts place at the centre of a £106bn impact capital market.
  • Government needs a Postcode Playbook.

Every postcode, in three weeks

In a matter of weeks, “every postcode” became the phrase the centre of government organises around.

On 21 July 2026, a machinery of government statement established No.10 North as “the engine room of devolution and good growth in every postcode,” pulling local economic growth and devolution strategy out of MHCLG and the Treasury and into the centre. On 5 August, the Cabinet Office redefined social value in central government contracts as “taking account of how a supplier will work for our communities to provide good British jobs, skills and opportunities in every postcode” (PPN 026). Both build on the Office for the Impact Economy, launched in November 2025 to put place at the centre of impact capital.

The Prime Minister, Andy Burnham, reduced the procurement change to a single test: when a business bids for a government contract, is it creating British jobs, and is it giving young people the skills they need? The £90bn spent each year, he said, should support jobs, skills and people in every postcode.

The shared word is postcode. Across all three instruments, government is choosing to direct money and strategy by where it lands, not only by what it buys or funds. That makes geography, at a fine grain, the thing being measured.

Figure 1: “Every postcode” across three instruments

InstrumentDateWhat it directsHow “postcode” enters
No.10 North (machinery of government)21 Jul 2026Devolution and local growth strategy, pulled into the centre“The engine room of devolution and good growth in every postcode”
PPN 026 (social value)5 Aug 2026~£90bn of central government contracts above £1mSocial value defined as jobs, skills and opportunities “in every postcode”
Office for the Impact EconomyNov 2025 onwardImpact capital and philanthropy, a £106bn marketPlace at the centre; opportunity “regardless of background or postcode”

Why a playbook

Government runs its commercial decisions through playbooks. Two now sit either side of the same question, whether to buy a service or to deliver it directly.

The Sourcing Playbook (first published 2021, last updated 15 June 2026) is the repeatable method for how government buys: make-or-buy decisions, market health, delivery model assessment, KPIs, risk allocation and pricing, and management of the commercial lifecycle. Its social value component predates PPN 026 and will be overtaken by the new model from January 2027.

Its sister guide, published on 17 June 2026, is PPN 024, the Public Interest Test and insourcing strategy. It is the method for the opposite decision: whether a service is better delivered in-house. It sets a two-part Public Interest Test, asks departments spending £100m or more a year on contracts to hold a five-year Insourcing Strategy, and tells practitioners to weigh whole-life cost, resilience, local investment and the impact on local communities, not price alone.

Figure 2: The make-or-buy playbooks

The Sourcing PlaybookInsourcing and the Public Interest Test – Guidance Note
Decision it governsWhether and how to buy from the marketWhether to deliver a service in-house
Published / updated2021, last updated 15 June 202617 June 2026
Core contentMake-or-buy, market health, delivery model assessment, KPIs, risk and pricingTwo-part Public Interest Test; five-year Insourcing Strategies for £100m+ spenders; holistic value for money
OwnerCabinet Office / Government Commercial FunctionCabinet Office
How place entersThrough the social value model (now PPN 026)Local investment and impact on local communities, as value-for-money factors

Both answer a commercial question: make or buy. Neither, on its own, establishes where the money lands.

Why a postcode playbook?

Discussion draft v1

A Postcode Playbook is more ambitious than either, because “every postcode” reaches far beyond procurement. It is not a commercial-lifecycle guide. It is the discipline of bringing genuine postcode-level evidence into the business case for any spending or investment decision, at Outline Business Case stage, across the Five Case Model, whether the choice is to buy, to insource, to fund, or to attract private and impact capital. All public expenditure and investment decisions are heading toward a postcode test.

What that requires, assembled the same way each time and held as live data rather than a one-off:

  • Strategic case: the place-based need. Who the intervention is for and where, set against deprivation, local authority and constituency.
  • Economic case: options appraisal and additionality at area level (the Green Book): deadweight, displacement and substitution, tested against a real baseline for the place.
  • Commercial case: the make-or-buy decision itself (the Sourcing Playbook or the Public Interest Test), and the coalition around it: finding the local delivery partners who can actually provide the jobs and training, and building the collaboration between prime supplier, partners and funders, with local supplier, provider and lender presence mapped.
  • Financial case: where the money, and any private or impact capital, actually lands, and the return leg wherever investment is involved; and the capital solutions that close the timing gap, funding delivery capacity ahead of the procurement demand.
  • Management case: KPIs defined and reported at postcode level and monitored as live data; the contractually binding social value obligations behind them; and the risk management that delivering those commitments requires.

A Postcode Playbook also has to carry additionality and evaluation down to postcode level, against the standards government already sets.

Additionality and evaluation in government

Government also has its own standards for testing whether capital of this kind is additional. The Green Book, HM Treasury’s appraisal guidance, defines additionality against:

  • deadweight (whether the outcome would have happened anyway)
  • displacement
  • substitution
  • leakage

The Magenta Book, its evaluation companion, sets out how to build a counterfactual, with supplements on Quality in Policy Impact Evaluation (QPIE) and Quality in Qualitative Evaluation (QQE).

Value for money

Postcode-level evaluation, and parliamentary scrutiny, of the three Es that underpin value for money: economy, efficiency and effectiveness. Here the Postcode Playbook supplements the accounting officer guidance in HM Treasury’s Managing Public Money, under which accounting officers answer to Parliament for the value for money of public spending.

Postcode data explorers available now

SDWH is publishing postcode-level analysis. The community finance explorer is public; the care explorers, with location-by-location detail, are members’ resources.

Search by postcode for deprivation indices across all four UK nations, and filter between local authority and parliamentary constituency. To request members’ access, or to discuss applying these layers to a specific place or portfolio, please get in touch.


What the rules now reward

Procurement is where the postcode test bites first. Social value applies to central government contracts above £1m: part of the roughly £90bn of contracts central government lets each year, within a public sector procurement bill approaching £400bn. From 1 January 2027, departments will score it in every such contract. For contracts of £5m and above, the weighting doubles, from 10% to 20% of the assessment. The model is stripped back to two outcomes, good jobs and skills, across six award criteria.

Figure 3: How social value changed

Previous Social Value Model (PPN 06/20)PPN 026 (from January 2027)
ThresholdAbove-threshold central government contracts£1m total contract value
Structure5 themes, 8 policy outcomes2 outcomes, 6 award criteria
WeightingTypically a minimum of 10%10% (£1m to £5m), 20% (£5m and above)
Poor performanceNot explicitCan count toward exclusion from future tenders (para 18)
KPI on social valueGeneral KPI duty (s52)Plus at least one social value KPI for £5m+ (para 17)

Two of the six criteria, on training and on building a talent pipeline, reward suppliers who reach “areas of multiple deprivation.” The scoring now turns on knowing where those areas are. That is a mapping question before it is a procurement question. A contracting authority that wants to award those points, and a supplier that wants to win them, both need to see deprivation at the level the contract is delivered.

PPN 026 will report through machinery the Procurement Act already provides: KPIs and performance published on the central digital platform, the Find a Tender service, under sections 52 and 71 of the Procurement Act. That reporting is still bedding in. In its one-year review of Find a Tender data, the Open Contracting Partnership found that 4.7% of contracts carried any KPI, rising to 28% for contracts above £5 million, with the first contract performance notice appearing at the end of February 2026.

Impact investment

Two strands of policy now point at the same postcodes.

  1. Public procurement: social value attaches jobs, skills and training to the places a contract touches.
  2. Impact investment: government is working to channel institutional and charitable money into communities, through the Office for the Impact Economy as a single front door, and is actively promoting the expansion of community finance. It estimates the impact economy is worth £106 billion to the UK.

The question is how to generate complementary benefits to multiply impact. The answer runs in two parts.

First, there is a delivery market already in place. On the government’s own definition, 6.2% of UK small businesses, around 347,000 organisations, are social enterprises: bodies that trade, and reinvest the surplus in a social mission. Most are micro, and many are rooted in the places policy is trying to reach. These are the grass roots that turn a social value commitment into jobs and training on a specific street. The Social Impact Investment Advisory Group set out a “staircase model” for how different forms of capital, from grants to social investment to institutional money, work together to move these organisations toward maturity and scale, matched to the needs of different places.

Second, there is a timing issue. A government supplier’s social value commitment funds programmes, in education, training and work experience, that are to be delivered in the specific areas a contract reaches, and may rely on local delivery partners. Those partners have to exist, and be ready, when the contract lands. Institutional impact capital, meanwhile, is looking for somewhere to invest, and return value over time. The opportunity is for that capital to provide the upfront funding to expand delivery capacity ahead of the procurement demand, so that when the social value commitment arrives there is something in the right postcode to deliver it.

This is a complex market of flows and partners: a procurement that must create jobs, jobs that can only be created in particular places, delivery partners who need capital before the contract exists, and investors who need places to deploy. A Postcode Playbook maps those flows and partners, so the two strands reinforce each other rather than pass in the night.


Sources

  1. No.10 North / Machinery of Government Changes, HLWS298, 21 July 2026. questions-statements.parliament.uk
  2. PPN 026: The Social Value Model, 5 August 2026. gov.uk
  3. PPN 026 model text (Annex A). gov.uk
  4. “Government orders that public spending must back British jobs and skills in every postcode,” 5 August 2026. gov.uk
  5. Office for the Impact Economy. gov.uk
  6. “Local communities set to benefit as new Office for the Impact Economy…,” 11 November 2025. gov.uk
  7. Final report of the Social Impact Investment Advisory Group (SIIAG). gov.uk
  8. Social enterprise: market trends 2023 (DCMS). gov.uk
  9. Central Digital Platform and Publication of Information (Cabinet Office guidance, 5 May 2026). gov.uk
  10. Open Contracting Partnership, “The UK Procurement Act one year on: what does the data tell us?” 3 March 2026. open-contracting.org
  11. The Green Book: appraisal and evaluation in central government. gov.uk
  12. The Magenta Book: central government guidance on evaluation. gov.uk
  13. Managing Public Money (HM Treasury, April 2026 version). gov.uk
  14. The Sourcing Playbook (Cabinet Office / Government Commercial Function; first published 20 May 2021; last updated 15 June 2026). gov.uk
  15. PPN 024: The Public Interest Test and insourcing strategy (Cabinet Office, published 17 June 2026). gov.uk
  16. HM Treasury Green Book, the Five Case Model (Strategic, Economic, Commercial, Financial, Management). gov.uk
  17. Andy Burnham (Prime Minister), LinkedIn, “We’re changing the rules…” (background).
  18. FT, “UK to strip back procurement rules to focus on job creation, says Louise Haigh,” 4 August 2026 (background).

Draft commentary. This page presents an SDWH working draft (7 August 2026, v1.0). It is produced by SDWH Limited for information purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal or regulatory advice. SDWH Limited is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Figures are drawn from the government publications linked above and from public sources.